British Columbia -
News Sections
News Programs
Could Google mentor's gift revolutionize UBC science?
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(8)
By: Darcy Wintonyk, ctvbc.ca
Date: Thursday Jan. 14, 2010 1:46 PM PT
A man widely hailed as the visionary behind Google has given the University of British Columbia a $2 million gift to revolutionize the way the institute teaches science.
UBC grad David Cheriton, now a computer science professor at Stanford University, partnered with the school because of what he saw as a need to transform antiquated teaching methods.
"In the age of Google students have all the information at their hands at all times. They don't want to learn things they can learn on their own," he told ctvbc.ca from Palo Alto, California.
The gift will support the Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative (CWSEI), a program that aims to improve the undergraduate experience by establishing new teaching techniques and overhauling course curriculum.
CWSEI founder, Nobel laureate Dr. Carl Wieman, said the program is based on advances in the last 20 years in cognitive science and education.
"Most teaching is the way they were taught in the 15th century so we're trying to change something that is thousands of years old," he told ctvbc.ca.
"This will help the way people learn and think about science, and new ways of teaching these complex teaching skills."
This entails teaching students how to learn, rather than simply memorizing facts and formulas. Professors are taught how to teach to their student competencies and individual motivations, and establish early what they already know, to avoid duplication.
Cheriton, who was born and raised in the Vancouver-area, became interested in the UBC program after having what he calls "a crisis" in his own teaching at Stanford.
"I wasn't sure what the students would know after a year after taking my class -- what they took away from it. And then I realized something had to change. We're trying to launch people's careers, not just for them to beat an exam."
He says today's students need more than book learning to succeed in a rapidly changing and highly competitive job market. And with an economy largely based on science and technology, Cheriton says citizens need to be technically literate and have complex problem-solving skills.
"If you try to get a job at Google they give you a technical interview -- they ask you to solve problems. So that's what employers are demanding and that's what the world is demanding -- I think it's important that universities do this."
The professor is credited for facilitating Google's invention by mentoring two of his Stanford students and helping them turn their dreams of creating a unique search engine into a reality.
Cheriton's vision is now focused on Wieman's work in transforming how people learn and teach science at the most fundamental level. It's a goal Wieman has been repeatedly told is "impossible."
"I wouldn't be trying if I didn't think it was possible but I'm also the guy who spent 20 years trying out physics experiments."
Wieman, who won a Nobel Prize for physics in 2001 because of that hard work, shut down his atomic research centre at the University of Colorado in 2007 to introduce the program at UBC. Now three years into its five-year project, 47 courses have undergone transformations.
UBC President Stephen Toope says the endowment will benefit more than 18,000 students each year, and praised Cheriton's accomplishments as an alumnus and philanthropist.
"His mentorship and foresight 15 years ago fostered the ubiquitous search engine that revolutionized the way people acquire information. His generosity will help transform basic and applied science for decades to come."
Wieman says the grant money, though extremely helpful, is actually secondary to the recognition for the program.
"The important part isn't the money - it's the signal that from outside the university and the rest of the world that what we're trying to do here is cared about and it's not completely crazy."
Cheriton agrees.
"Writing the cheque is the easy part - making something great happen is the hard part."
User Tools
|
It`s about time. All those years of schooling, where I`d get assigned to reach chapters or do a research paper on this or that. What have I gotten out of it? Debt and lots of sleepless nights. University doesn`t do enough anymore to prepare their students for the real world. It`s bout time for change so that when students graduate they got the expierence and the know how to do their job instead of some fancy piece of paper that said you gradated with X majors. |
|
@ Eric: Judging from your writing--grammar and spelling--I don't think you ever went to university! I got alot of my university experience. And, my school, the University of British Columbia, prepared me for the real world thank you very much. |
|
It's called keeping up with the times--progression of growth. For all the good stemming from the Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative(CWSEI)to teach students how to think, vs the antiquated system of learning from our forefathers, will prove beneficial in that learning will be easier, more readily acceptable, which will create more learning in less time. And Professor David Cheriton backing him all the way with a hefty sum of two million bucks, now that's good vision! However, as great as education is, I hope it teaches students to think of their country and the state it's in, so that maybe they can help STOP Poverty by starting a collection for POVERTY IN CANADA, maybe the students can waken up the government, the people, and work on feeding the hungry,in more ways than food banks, like cheque hike-ups, mandatory lowered rents, food cheques that state for food only. Certainly, two million dollars would help starving people. Eating is a necessity which many don't get, to them it is a luxury. |
|
I don't actually think its right that we mess with science. the teachings are the way they are for a reason right? Also, teachers should be allowed to teach what they feel comfortable. That will make everyone's experience better. |
|
@Eric I disagree, I don't think education at that level should be targeted at satisfying certain job requirements. Universities are for mind expansion, for critical thinking and creativity. They're there to make people smarter, not with crystallized knowledge, but with better thought processes and maturity. The fact that universities don't churn out people ready to walk into what might be a high paying job the year they graduate is a small price to pay to create a genuinely intelligent population. |
|
For purposes of administrative convenience, grad school is unhealthily being transformed into an extension of boring undergrad classroom lectures. Yawn. Great article. More vision please. |
|
@Dan: "Alot" is actually spelled "a lot" and it is generally agreed that you should not begin sentences with conjunctions like "and" when the sentence in question could be connected to the previous sentence. Perhaps both of you should have paid a little more attention in first year English. Regarding the subject of this article, I agree that universities need to change their teaching methods to better prepare students for the real world. Of all the co-op students I've hired, the best have come from technical career colleges like BCIT rather than the universities. Universities are great at teaching theoretical knowledge but usually fall short on the practical tools necessary in the real world. - 2003 UBC Alum (Comp. Sci) |
Most Popular Stories
Related Stories
Most Shared on Facebook
Follow CTV British Columbia
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(8)-
Feedback



